Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.26 seconds)Section 156 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 200 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 24 in The Mental Health Act, 1987 [Entire Act]
Sakiri Vasu vs State Of U.P. And Others on 7 December, 2007
In view of the settled position in Sakiri Vasu case, the impugned judgment of the
High Court cannot be sustained and is hereby set aside. The Magistrate concerned is
directed to ensure proper investigation into the alleged offence under Section 156[3]
CrPC and if he deems it necessary, he can also recommend to the SSP/SP concerned a
change of the investigating officer, so that a proper investigation is done. The Magistrate
can also monitor the investigation, though he cannot himself investigate [as investigation
is the job of the police]. Parties may produce any material they wish before the
Magistrate concerned. The learned Magistrate shall be uninfluenced by any observation
in the impugned order of the High Court.