Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)
Kampuri vs Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd & Anr. on 6 May, 2014 cites

Tulsi Ram Arya vs Chairman D.V.B. & Ors. on 31 January, 2013

10. This brings me to the argument of Mr Choudhri that since funds, from which the pension is likely to be paid, have been transferred to respondent no.2 and, therefore, respondent no.2 should be called upon to make the payment, is according to me, an argument which pertains to accounting. Whether such funds have been transferred, and the extent to which this fund has been transferred, is an aspect which respondents, in my view, will have to sort out, between themselves. The Single Judge, in the case of Tulsi Ram Arya vs Chairman D.V.B. & Ors. has also taken this very view. I have no reason to take a different line on this issue.
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - V J Mehta - Full Document

North Delhi Power Ltd vs Govt. Of N.C.T. & Ors on 3 May, 2010

8.1 Furthermore if there was any doubt, it has been certainly put to rest by the Supreme Court by the following observations in paragraphs, 45, 50 and 52 of its judgement in the case of North Delhi Power Limited vs Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors. Pertinently, the observations of the Supreme Court referred to below, were made after discussing the provisions of the transfer scheme threadbare. For the purposes of convenience, the said observations are extracted hereinbelow:
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 10 - V S Sirpurkar - Full Document

Smt. Pawan Vohra vs The Chairman, Dvb Pension Trust And Anr. on 17 May, 2013

6.1 Apart from the above, reliance was also placed on other judgements of the Single Judges of this court. These being: Smt. Pawan Vohra vs The Chairman, DVB Pension Trust & Anr., dated 17.05.2013, passed in WP(C) 1680/2012; Trilok Chand vs DVB Employee's Terminal Benefit Fund Trust & Ors., dated 20.05.2013, passed in WP(C) 4815/2012; and Tulsi Ram Arya vs Chairman D.V.B. & Ors., dated 31.01.2013, passed in WP(C) 618/2001.
Delhi High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 8 - V J Mehta - Full Document

North Delhi Power Ltd. vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi [Along With Wp (C) ... on 2 July, 2007

6.2 Reliance is also placed on a judgement of the Single Judge of this court which was passed prior to the judgement of the Supreme Court in the case of North Delhi Power Limited vs Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors. This judgement is dated 28.05.2009 and, has been passed in a batch of review petitions filed, the lead petition being: CM No. 16398/2008 and Review Petition No. 14778/2008 in WP(C) 17629/2005.
Delhi High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 22 - S R Bhat - Full Document

Babu Ram Jain vs Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. on 4 August, 2011

Apart from the above, reliance is also placed on the judgement of this court in the case of: Babu Ram Jain vs BSES Yamuna Power Ltd., dated 04.08.2011, passed in WP(C) 1597/1998. To be noted, this was a judgement of a Single Judge of this court which was carried in appeal by the respondent therein to the Division Bench, which was numbered as LPA No. 113/2013. The Division Bench, however, dismissed the appeal of BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. on the ground that there was a delay of 541 days. I am informed that the matter has been carried in appeal to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, I am told, has stayed the operation of the judgement of the Division Bench.
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 6 - S Muralidhar - Full Document
1