Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.23 seconds)
Manju Bajpai vs Kvs on 25 April, 2023 cites

Gujarat Electricity Board & Anr vs Atmaram Sungomal Poshani on 31 March, 1989

39. The Apex Court in series of judgments like Gujarat Electricity Board Vs Atmaram Sungomal Poshani (Supra), Union of India Vs S.L. Abbas (supra),Public Services Tribunal Bar ... Vs State Of U.P. & Another(Supra), State of UP &Ors Vs Govardhan Lal (supra),Airport Authority of India Vs Rajeev Ratan Pandey and Ors (supra), Rajendra Singh &Ors Vs State of Uttar Pradesh &Ors(Supra) , State Of Haryana &Ors Vs Kashmir Singh &Ors (supra), Punjab and Sind Bank &Ors. Vs. Durgesh Kuwar (supra), Union of India and Others Vs. Ganesh Dass Singh (supra), has given upper hand to the administrative authorities or the Government in matters of Transfers. In all those judgments, the Apex Court held that the Public Interest is paramount in such administrative exercises and there is very limited scope for judicial review in the matters of transfer. As it has been held in the other set of judgments cited in paragarph 36 above, unless there is malafide, bias, 32 OA No.3751 of 2022 Court No.6 (item No.32) infringement of statutory provisions, lack of competency, non-application of mind, etc, the courts and tribunals should not interfere in the administrative decision in respect of transfers. In the instant case, as we have already discussed above, we do not find any such bias or non-application of mind in the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 574 - K N Singh - Full Document

Punjab And Sind Bank vs Durgesh Kuwar on 25 February, 2020

31. Sometimes, employees or employee groups assail the transfer policy or suspension of any particular clause or clauses of the transfer policy as it may create difficulties for individual or group of employees. As the transfer policies/circulars are only guidelines for the administrative Authorities, these cannot be enforceable by the courts [Punjab and Sind Bank &Ors. Vs. Durgesh Kuwar, 2020 (supra)]. Whether, the transfer policy or suspension of particular clause of transfer policy is good or bad, it is for the administrative authorities to consider the grievances of the employees in respect of a particular issue regarding transfer policy.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 8 - Cited by 37 - Full Document

Union Of India And Ors vs S.L. Abbas on 27 April, 1993

39. The Apex Court in series of judgments like Gujarat Electricity Board Vs Atmaram Sungomal Poshani (Supra), Union of India Vs S.L. Abbas (supra),Public Services Tribunal Bar ... Vs State Of U.P. & Another(Supra), State of UP &Ors Vs Govardhan Lal (supra),Airport Authority of India Vs Rajeev Ratan Pandey and Ors (supra), Rajendra Singh &Ors Vs State of Uttar Pradesh &Ors(Supra) , State Of Haryana &Ors Vs Kashmir Singh &Ors (supra), Punjab and Sind Bank &Ors. Vs. Durgesh Kuwar (supra), Union of India and Others Vs. Ganesh Dass Singh (supra), has given upper hand to the administrative authorities or the Government in matters of Transfers. In all those judgments, the Apex Court held that the Public Interest is paramount in such administrative exercises and there is very limited scope for judicial review in the matters of transfer. As it has been held in the other set of judgments cited in paragarph 36 above, unless there is malafide, bias, 32 OA No.3751 of 2022 Court No.6 (item No.32) infringement of statutory provisions, lack of competency, non-application of mind, etc, the courts and tribunals should not interfere in the administrative decision in respect of transfers. In the instant case, as we have already discussed above, we do not find any such bias or non-application of mind in the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 1804 - B P Reddy - Full Document

State Of Haryana & Ors vs Kashmir Singh & Ors on 6 October, 2010

39. The Apex Court in series of judgments like Gujarat Electricity Board Vs Atmaram Sungomal Poshani (Supra), Union of India Vs S.L. Abbas (supra),Public Services Tribunal Bar ... Vs State Of U.P. & Another(Supra), State of UP &Ors Vs Govardhan Lal (supra),Airport Authority of India Vs Rajeev Ratan Pandey and Ors (supra), Rajendra Singh &Ors Vs State of Uttar Pradesh &Ors(Supra) , State Of Haryana &Ors Vs Kashmir Singh &Ors (supra), Punjab and Sind Bank &Ors. Vs. Durgesh Kuwar (supra), Union of India and Others Vs. Ganesh Dass Singh (supra), has given upper hand to the administrative authorities or the Government in matters of Transfers. In all those judgments, the Apex Court held that the Public Interest is paramount in such administrative exercises and there is very limited scope for judicial review in the matters of transfer. As it has been held in the other set of judgments cited in paragarph 36 above, unless there is malafide, bias, 32 OA No.3751 of 2022 Court No.6 (item No.32) infringement of statutory provisions, lack of competency, non-application of mind, etc, the courts and tribunals should not interfere in the administrative decision in respect of transfers. In the instant case, as we have already discussed above, we do not find any such bias or non-application of mind in the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 429 - M Katju - Full Document

State Of Madya Pradesh & Ors vs Sri S.S. Kourav & Ors on 19 January, 1995

40. As regards the personal hardship of the applicant is concerned, we agree that the Apex Court in State of MP and Ors Vs S.S. Kourav & Ors [CA No. 1285 of 1995 decided 19.1.1995] held that the administrative Authority is best judge to consider such hardships and take appropriate decision keeping balance between personal hardship of employee and public interest . The apex court in this judgment held that :
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 502 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Public Services Tribunal Bar ... vs State Of U.P. & Another on 29 January, 2003

39. The Apex Court in series of judgments like Gujarat Electricity Board Vs Atmaram Sungomal Poshani (Supra), Union of India Vs S.L. Abbas (supra),Public Services Tribunal Bar ... Vs State Of U.P. & Another(Supra), State of UP &Ors Vs Govardhan Lal (supra),Airport Authority of India Vs Rajeev Ratan Pandey and Ors (supra), Rajendra Singh &Ors Vs State of Uttar Pradesh &Ors(Supra) , State Of Haryana &Ors Vs Kashmir Singh &Ors (supra), Punjab and Sind Bank &Ors. Vs. Durgesh Kuwar (supra), Union of India and Others Vs. Ganesh Dass Singh (supra), has given upper hand to the administrative authorities or the Government in matters of Transfers. In all those judgments, the Apex Court held that the Public Interest is paramount in such administrative exercises and there is very limited scope for judicial review in the matters of transfer. As it has been held in the other set of judgments cited in paragarph 36 above, unless there is malafide, bias, 32 OA No.3751 of 2022 Court No.6 (item No.32) infringement of statutory provisions, lack of competency, non-application of mind, etc, the courts and tribunals should not interfere in the administrative decision in respect of transfers. In the instant case, as we have already discussed above, we do not find any such bias or non-application of mind in the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 37 - Cited by 448 - Full Document

State Of U. P. & Ors vs Gobardhan Lal on 23 March, 2004

39. The Apex Court in series of judgments like Gujarat Electricity Board Vs Atmaram Sungomal Poshani (Supra), Union of India Vs S.L. Abbas (supra),Public Services Tribunal Bar ... Vs State Of U.P. & Another(Supra), State of UP &Ors Vs Govardhan Lal (supra),Airport Authority of India Vs Rajeev Ratan Pandey and Ors (supra), Rajendra Singh &Ors Vs State of Uttar Pradesh &Ors(Supra) , State Of Haryana &Ors Vs Kashmir Singh &Ors (supra), Punjab and Sind Bank &Ors. Vs. Durgesh Kuwar (supra), Union of India and Others Vs. Ganesh Dass Singh (supra), has given upper hand to the administrative authorities or the Government in matters of Transfers. In all those judgments, the Apex Court held that the Public Interest is paramount in such administrative exercises and there is very limited scope for judicial review in the matters of transfer. As it has been held in the other set of judgments cited in paragarph 36 above, unless there is malafide, bias, 32 OA No.3751 of 2022 Court No.6 (item No.32) infringement of statutory provisions, lack of competency, non-application of mind, etc, the courts and tribunals should not interfere in the administrative decision in respect of transfers. In the instant case, as we have already discussed above, we do not find any such bias or non-application of mind in the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 1319 - D Raju - Full Document
1   2 3 Next