Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.21 seconds)
Abdul Quddhose.J vs M/S.Sri Thenandal Films cites

Dhanpat vs Sheo Ram (Deceased) Through His Lrs. on 19 March, 2020

In view of the settled law as laid down in the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court in Dhanpat VS. Sheo Ram (Deceased) through Legal Representatives and Others reported in 2020 (16) SCC 209 and that too when sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant / plaintiff for not producing the originals, this Court will have to allow the application as prayed for.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 64 - H Gupta - Full Document

Bipin Shantilal Panchal vs State Of Gujarat And Anr on 22 February, 2001

Though, the learned counsel for the respondent / defendant would rely upon a judgment of the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Criminal Trials Guidelines Regarding Inadequacies and Deficiencies, In Re Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others reported in 2021 (10) SCC 598 to substantiate his argument that the Judgment rendered in Bipin Shantilal Panchal Vs. State of Gujarat and Another reported in 11/15 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2001 (3) SCC 1 has been declared to be bad in law, the Judgment of the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Dhanpat VS. Sheo Ram (Deceased) through Legal Representatives and Others reported in 2020 (16) SCC 209, which is the standard decision with regard to the present issue has not been overruled in the decision reported in 2021 (10) SCC 598 i.e., Bipin Shantilal case. Further, the decision rendered in 2021 (10) SCC 598 pertains to criminal trial as the Honourable Supreme Court has framed guidelines with regard to criminal trials and the inadequacies and deficiencies with regard to criminal trials and explicitly it is disclosed that the petitioner is Criminal Trials Guidelines Regarding Inadequacies and Deficiencies, In Re. In the case on hand, it is a civil suit and it is not a criminal trial which was in consideration by the Honourable Supreme Court in 2021 (10) SCC 598. Therefore, the decision relied upon by the learned counsel for the respondent / defendant reported in 2021 (10) SCC 598 has no bearing to the facts of the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 535 - Full Document

In Re:Destruction Of Public&Pvt. Prop vs State Of A.P. & Ors on 16 April, 2009

Though, the learned counsel for the respondent / defendant would rely upon a judgment of the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Criminal Trials Guidelines Regarding Inadequacies and Deficiencies, In Re Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others reported in 2021 (10) SCC 598 to substantiate his argument that the Judgment rendered in Bipin Shantilal Panchal Vs. State of Gujarat and Another reported in 11/15 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2001 (3) SCC 1 has been declared to be bad in law, the Judgment of the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Dhanpat VS. Sheo Ram (Deceased) through Legal Representatives and Others reported in 2020 (16) SCC 209, which is the standard decision with regard to the present issue has not been overruled in the decision reported in 2021 (10) SCC 598 i.e., Bipin Shantilal case. Further, the decision rendered in 2021 (10) SCC 598 pertains to criminal trial as the Honourable Supreme Court has framed guidelines with regard to criminal trials and the inadequacies and deficiencies with regard to criminal trials and explicitly it is disclosed that the petitioner is Criminal Trials Guidelines Regarding Inadequacies and Deficiencies, In Re. In the case on hand, it is a civil suit and it is not a criminal trial which was in consideration by the Honourable Supreme Court in 2021 (10) SCC 598. Therefore, the decision relied upon by the learned counsel for the respondent / defendant reported in 2021 (10) SCC 598 has no bearing to the facts of the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 72 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1