Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.55 seconds)
Sh. Baljit Singh Sondhi vs Union Of India on 12 February, 2009 cites

Union Of India And Ors vs K. K. Dhawan on 27 January, 1993

However, insofar as an officer charged in a disciplinary proceeding on account of discharge of quasi-judicial functions in Duli Chand (supra) the decision of a three-Judge Bench in K.K. Dhawan (supra) has been held to be the correct law, overruling the decision in Zunjarao Bhikaji Nagarkar v. Union of India & Ors., 1999 (7) SCC, 409 and the following parameters have been laid down for interference in judicial review at an interlocutory stage:
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 229 - S Mohan - Full Document

Mathura Prasad vs Union Of India & Ors on 1 November, 2006

12. A judicial review in a disciplinary proceeding though limited but has parameters. By the alleged act of misconduct if one is sought to be deprived of his livelihood, strict following of the procedure laid down under the rules is obligatory. A judicial review would lie if there is an error of law apparent on the face of record. If a statutory authority uses the power in a manner not provided under the rules or passes an order without application of mind, review would be maintainable. An error of fact also attracts the principle of judicial review. The aforesaid is the dicta ruled in Mathura Prasad v. Union of India, 2007 (1) SCC 437.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 94 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Divisional Forests Officer And Ors vs M. Ramalinga Reddy on 10 April, 2007

As ruled by the Apex Court in Divisional Forest Officer v. M. Ramalinga Reddy, 2007 (9) SCC 286, where a show cause notice issued is passed without application of mind and is otherwise illegal it could be interfered with in a judicial review. Interference at an interlocutory stage of a disciplinary proceeding does not oust within its ambit an interference where either the order passed is without jurisdiction or is contrary to law. One of the pioneer decisions is in Upendra Singhs case (supra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 54 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Zunjarrao Bhikaji Nagarkar vs U.O.I. And Others on 6 August, 1999

However, insofar as an officer charged in a disciplinary proceeding on account of discharge of quasi-judicial functions in Duli Chand (supra) the decision of a three-Judge Bench in K.K. Dhawan (supra) has been held to be the correct law, overruling the decision in Zunjarao Bhikaji Nagarkar v. Union of India & Ors., 1999 (7) SCC, 409 and the following parameters have been laid down for interference in judicial review at an interlocutory stage:
Supreme Court of India Cites 41 - Cited by 261 - D P Wadhwa - Full Document
1   2 Next