Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.21 seconds)The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Krishna Janardhan Bhat vs Dattatraya G. Hegde on 11 January, 2008
It is settled preposition of law that the guilt of accused must be proved beyond
reasonable doubt and reliance has been placed by this court on the judgments of Bharat
Barrel & Drum Manufacturing Company Vs. Amit Chand Payrelal [( 1999 ) 3 SCC
35]and of Krishna Janardhan Bhat v. Dattatraya G.Hegde(2008)4 SCC54 wherein
it was held that "Furthermore, whereas prosecution must prove the guilt of an accused
beyond all reasonable doubt, the standard of proof so as to prove a defence on the part
of an accused is preponderance of probabilities. Inference of preponderance of
probabilities can be drawn not only from` the materials brought on records by the parties
but also by reference to the circumstances upon which he relies".
Section 20 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Bharat Barrel And Drum Manufacturing ... vs Amin Chand Payrelal on 18 February, 1999
It is settled preposition of law that the guilt of accused must be proved beyond
reasonable doubt and reliance has been placed by this court on the judgments of Bharat
Barrel & Drum Manufacturing Company Vs. Amit Chand Payrelal [( 1999 ) 3 SCC
35]and of Krishna Janardhan Bhat v. Dattatraya G.Hegde(2008)4 SCC54 wherein
it was held that "Furthermore, whereas prosecution must prove the guilt of an accused
beyond all reasonable doubt, the standard of proof so as to prove a defence on the part
of an accused is preponderance of probabilities. Inference of preponderance of
probabilities can be drawn not only from` the materials brought on records by the parties
but also by reference to the circumstances upon which he relies".
Section 251 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 87 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
K. Bhaskaran vs Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan And Anr on 29 September, 1999
Reliance has also been placed by this court on the judgment of K.Bhaskaran v.
Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan and others [AIR 1999 SC 3762] wherein it was held that
"As the complainant has discharged his initial burden, the onus shifted on the accused to
produce rebuttal evidence against the presumption laid down in favour of the
complainant".