Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.22 seconds)

Gian Dutt Pandey @ Gyan Dutt Pandey vs Union Of India Nad Another on 31 October, 2019

Though a Co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal followed the judgment rendered in the case of Virender Gyani Dutt (supra) of Hon'ble Guahati High Court and allowed the benefit of increased pension from the date the pensioner entered the 80th year of age. The view taken by the Coordinate Bench was based on the material placed before it by the learned counsel for the parties in that case.
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

C.Balakrishnan Nair vs Union Of India Represented By The ... on 16 May, 2011

However, in view of the unambiguous language of the relevant Rule 44(6) of CCS (Pension) and subsequent O.M. dated 01.09.2008 on the issue and considering the recent conditional stay order dated 09.02.2024 (supra) granted by the Hon'ble Supreme and following the law settled on the issue by the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of S.S.Bola (supra), I hold that the applicant will be entitled to additional pension @ 20% and 30% after he completed the age of 80 years and 85 years respectively as per CCS (Pension) Rules. The Original Application is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs."
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1