Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.16 seconds)Lily Thomas, Etc. Etc. vs Union Of India & Ors. on 5 April, 2000
This is evident
from Ext.P3 communication issued by the third respondent to the
Secretary of All Kerala Chemists & Druggists Association. By Ext.P3,
the Secretary of All Kerala Chemists & Druggists Association was
advised to inform its members to quote the Drug Licence numbers of
the hospitals in the invoice/bills issued for supply of medicines/drugs.
The petitioners challenged Ext.P3 before this Court. The said
challenge was repelled by a Division Bench of this Court, by the
decision reported in Thomas v. Union of India (2000 (2) KLT 459).
Though the Original Petitions were dismissed, certain directions
adverse to the Government were also issued in that judgment. So,
both sides appealed before the Supreme Court, challenging the said
decision. The Apex Court, by Ext.P4 order permitted to withdraw the
Writ Petitions, with liberty to file fresh Writ Petitions, with proper
pleadings. In the light of Ext.P4, the present Writ Petition is filed,
seeking the following reliefs:
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 18 in The Drugs And Cosmetics Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Section 33 in The Drugs And Cosmetics Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
1