Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.20 seconds)

Kumari Kiran Thr. Her Father ... vs Sajjan Singh & Ors on 11 September, 2014

5. Per contra, Sri Gurukumar V.A., learned counsel appearing for respondents No.1 to 4 supports the impugned judgment and award of the Tribunal and submits that the Tribunal taking note of the fact that the Jurisdictional Police after investigation filed charge sheet against the driver of the offending bus and in cross-examination, he has admitted with regard to the filing of the charge sheet. It is further submitted that mere head-on collision itself will not establish that the driver of the auto rickshaw was negligent and in support of his -6- NC: 2025:KHC-D:11901-DB MFA No. 104301 of 2023 HC-KAR contention, he placed reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Kumari Kiran through her father Harinarayan v. Sajjan Singh and others2. Hence, he seeks to dismiss the appeal.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 288 - V G Gowda - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi And Others on 22 June, 2022

Insofar as an award of compensation by the Tribunal under the head of funeral expenses i.e. ₹25,000/- is concerned, we are of the view that it is contrary to the law laid on by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi & Others3. Hence, we modify the impugned order of the Tribunal only to the aforesaid 3 2017 (16) SCC 680 -9- NC: 2025:KHC-D:11901-DB MFA No. 104301 of 2023 HC-KAR extent and awarded ₹15,000/- under the aforesaid head as against ₹25,000/- awarded by the Tribunal.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1946 - J R Dua - Full Document
1