Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.23 seconds)Section 45 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Delimitation Act, 1972
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Bande Siva Shankara Srinivasa Prasad vs Ravi Surya Prakash Babu And Others on 18 December, 2015
15. The aforesaid judgment was upheld by a full bench of the High Court of
Judicature, Telangana and Andhra Pradesh in Bande Siva Shankara
Srinivasa Prasad Vs. Ravi Surya Prakash and others (4th supra).
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Janachaitanya Housing Ltd. Rep. By Its ... vs Divya Financiers, A Proprietorship ... on 31 March, 2008
14. Under similar circumstances, a learned Division Bench of the erstwhile
High Court of Andhra Pradesh, in Janachaitanya Housing Ltd., Hyderabad
Vs. Divya Financiers, Guntur (2nd supra), held as under:
M/S Bagai Construction Tr.Prop vs M/S Gupta Building Material Store on 22 February, 2013
20. The law laid down in the said judgment is not in dispute, but, this Court
is of the opinion that the same is not applicable to the case on hand
considering its facts and circumstances.
Ajay Kumar Parmar vs State Of Rajasthan on 27 September, 2012
In Ajay Kumar Parmar v. State of Rajasthan6, the Apex Court held
that, the Courts while dealing with handwriting or signatures cannot itself act
as an Expert. The relevant paragraph is extracted below:
Section 73 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
1