Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.23 seconds)
Surjit Singh And Anr vs State Of Punjab on 16 September, 2022 cites

Charan Singh Etc., Lakha Singh vs State Of Punjab, State Of Punjab on 24 October, 1997

In judgment by a Single Judge of this Court Lakha Singh Vs. State of Punjab, 2015(1) RCR (Criminal) 842, it was observed that 14 of 16 ::: Downloaded on - 21-09-2022 02:12:19 ::: CRA-S-716-SB-2007 (O&M) -15- when ruqa had been sent from the spot narrating all the facts and on the basis of which formal FIR was recorded and copy thereof were also sent to the Illaqa Magistrate i.e. due compliance of Section 42 of the Act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 14 - S P Kurdukar - Full Document

Jarnail Singh & Ors. Etc vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 7 May, 1986

However, this objection does not carry any weightage. The Apex Court in judgment Jarnail Singh Vs. State of Punjab, 2011 AIR (Supreme Court) 964, had observed that mere delay in sending the sample of the narcotic to the office of Chemical Examiner would not be sufficient to conclude that the sample had been tampered with, when the evidence on record indicate that delay was wholly was unintentional. The delay of 12 days in sending the sample was not held to be fatal to the prosecution.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 613 - B C Ray - Full Document

Mulkh Raj Krishan Kumar & Co. vs The State Of Punjab And Ors. on 21 December, 1971

In judgment Krishan Singh's (supra), it was observed that when 35 bags containing 35 kgs poppy husk in each bag were recovered from the possession of the appellant and his co-accused, such a huge quantity of the contraband could not be planted by the police from its own source, that too, just for the false implication, the conviction and sentence of the accused given by the trial Court was upheld.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 58 - Full Document
1   2 Next