Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 24 (2.34 seconds)Natasha Singh vs Cbi (State) on 8 May, 2013
In view of the above facts and circumstances, keeping in mind the settled position of law in Natasha Singh (supra) and Dr. Rajesh Talwar (supra) and without going into the merits of the case, the order dated 23.4.2024 is set aside. The application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court to recall the prosecution witnesses, PW-1, PW-2, & PW-3 for cross-examination by the applicants.
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Nur Nehar Begum @ Nur Nehar And 8 Ors vs The State Of Assam on 16 September, 2019
In Neha Begum and others Vs. The State of Assam and another, 2024 0 Supreme (SC) 746, the application under Section 311, Cr.P.C. was filed for further cross-examination of prosecution witnesses with reason that their erstwhile engaged lawyer had not properly cross-examined the witnesses and no proposed questions have been mentioned.