Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.43 seconds)T. Subramanian vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 4 January, 2006
16. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in T.Subramanian vs.
State of Tamil Nadu (2006) 1 SCC 401, has held that where two
views are reasonably possible from the very same evidence,
prosecution cannot be said to have proved its case beyond
reasonable doubt.
Chandrappa & Ors vs State Of Karnataka on 15 February, 2007
In Chandrappa vs. State of Karnataka, (2007) 4 SCC
415, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has culled out the following
principles qua powers of the appellate Courts while dealing with an
appeal against an order of acquittal:
Section 376 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
K. Prakashan vs P.K. Surenderan on 10 October, 2007
15. It has been held in K. Prakashan vs. P.K. Surenderan
(2008) 1 SCC 258, that when two views are possible, appellate
Court should not reverse the judgment of acquittal merely because
the other view was possible. When judgment of trial Court was
::: Downloaded on - 16/03/2018 23:27:26 :::HCHP
14
neither perverse, nor suffered from any legal infirmity or non
consideration/mis-appreciation of evidence on record, reversal
thereof by High Court was not justified.
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
1