Dr. Duryodhan Sahu And Ors vs Jitendra Kumar Mishra And Ors on 25 August, 1998
9. We have no hesitation in coming to the
conclusion that the dispute, in the present Public Interest
Litigation being related to service matter, cannot be entertained
in a PIL proceeding, because of the decisions in the cases of
Girjesh Shrivastava vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [(2010)
10 SCC 707], Hari Bansh Lal vs. S P Mahto [(2010) 9 SCC
655], Ashok Kumar Pandey vs. State of West Bengal
[(2004) 3 SCC 349], Dattaraj Nathuji Thaware vs. State of
Maharastra & Ors. [(2005) 1 SCC 590], Duryodhan Sahu
vs. Jitendra Kumar Mishra [(1998) 7 SCC 273] and R K
Jain vs. Union of India [(1993) 4 SCC 119].