Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (1.68 seconds)

Coal India Ltd. & Ors vs Saroj Kumar Mishra on 17 April, 2007

7. While that part of the rules which insists on timely promotion under FCS is not adhered to, executive instructions are issued violating the rules, which grant in situ promotions, on completion of the residency period in the feeder cadre, other conditions being fulfilled. As held by the Apex Court in Coal India Ltd vs. Saroj Kumar Mishra (supra), the right to promotion can be withheld or kept in abeyance only in terms of valid rules. In the instant case, the executive instructions are not in conformity with the regulations of in situ promotion under the Flexible Complementing Scheme at Annexure-2 and the residency period as at Annexure-2(a). As observed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in (2009) 12 SCC 49 Para 8, executive instructions cannot override the rules. In the light of the above, Annexure-4 and Annexure-5 orders are not tenable in the eyes of law as they are not in consonance with the Flexible Complementing Scheme. Therefore, in our considered opinion, they have to be modified and the OA is liable to succeed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 183 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1