Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.23 seconds)The Railways Act, 1989
Section 123 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
Union Of India vs Rina Devi on 9 May, 2018
In
para 30 of the judgment in Rina Devis's case referred to supra,
the Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down the law that on such
compensation interest payable is 6% per annum. Therefore,
the claimants are entitled to compensation of Rs.6,40,000/-
with interest thereon at 6% from the date of the claim petition
till its realisation. Hence, the following:
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs Kahlon @ Jasmail Singh Kahlon ... on 16 August, 2021
22. First of all Rule 26 of Railway Claims Tribunal
(Procedure) Rules, 1989 provides that on the death of the
claimant during the pendency of the proceedings before the
Tribunal, the legal representatives may come on record and
continue the proceedings. Further, Hon'ble Supreme Court in
the judgment in Oriental Insurance Company Limited v.
Kahlon @ Jasmail Singh Kahlon2 while dealing with the similar
case in road traffic accident held that "actio personalis moritur
cum persona" does not apply to such cases as they are the
welfare legislations.
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
The Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987
Ranjeet Singh vs Union Of India on 11 December, 2018
In the judgment of
the Rajasthan High court in Ranjeet Singh v. Union of India4, in
a case of railway accident itself relying on Rule 26 it was held
that the cause of action survives to the dependents defined
under Section 123 of the Railway Act.
1