Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.24 seconds)
Bharat S/O Ramkrushna Gajle And Ors. vs Jaiprakash S/O Khanchand Harwani on 6 November, 2025 cites

Badrinarayan Chunilal Bhutada vs Govindram Ramgopal Mundada on 15 January, 2003

12. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has in the case of Badrinarayan Chunilal Bhutada (supra) held that when a suit for eviction on the ground of bona fide need is filed by landlord the tenant must establish by leading evidence that attempts were made by him to find out other alternate accommodation either by way of sale or on rent and unless the tenant proves the same, it must be held that burden of proving the issue of comparative hardship is not discharged by the tenant. This Court has also held that the issue of comparative hardship cannot be answered in favour of the tenant in the absence of any attempt on his part to look for alternate accommodation.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 66 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Jain Supari Centre, Nagpur Partnership ... vs Rameshlal Motilal Hasoriya And Others on 27 July, 2022

In support of his contention, the learned Advocate has placed reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Badrinarayan Chunilal Bhutada Vs. Govindram Ramgopal Mundada, reported in (2003) 2 SCC 320, judgment of the Bombay High Court in the matter of Bismilla Bee w/o Sk. Chand and another Vs. Mohd. Anwar s/o Mohd. Akhtar, reported in 2010 (2) Mh.L.J. 829 and another unreported judgment of this Court at its Nagpur Bench in Writ Petition No.3234/2022 (Jain Supari Centre, a Partnership Firm, through its partner Shri Shantilal Sohanlal Baid and another Vs. Shri Rameshlal Motilal Hasoriya and others, decided on 27/07/2022).
Bombay High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - M Pitale - Full Document
1