Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.26 seconds)Baldev Singh Bajwa vs Monish Saini on 5 October, 2005
The Apex Court in Baldev Singh Bajwa v. Monish Saini
2005(2) R.C.R. 470 has held that "where the NRI landlord seeks eviction
of tenant on the ground of bona fide requirement, the tenant would be
entitled for leave to contest only if he makes a strong case to challenge
those grounds and is able to show :
Bhandari General Store And Ors. vs Makhan Singh Grewal on 22 February, 2006
This Court has held in M/s Bhadari General Store and
another v. Makhan Singh Grewal 2006(2) Civil Court Cases 633 that "in
case the NRI-landlord having more than one property, it is his choice to get
one building vacated under Section 13-B of the Act out of two or more
buildings."
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949
Ravinder Paul Mohindra vs Gurbachan Singh And Ors. on 31 May, 2006
In Ravinder Pal Mohindra v. Gurbacha Singh and others
2006(2) R.C.R. (Rent) 211 similar question was decided. In that case the
joint property was let out by one of the co-owners and not by the NRI-
landlord himself. It was held therein that "It is settled principal of law that
letting out by a co-owner would be letting out on behalf of other co-
owners." Thereafter, even if there is rent note executed in favour of the
mother of the respondent even then it is to be assumed that the shop was
letted out by her on behalf of the all the co-owners and not to their
exclusion. The respondent is not deprived of the benefit to recover the
immediate possession of the shop on account that the same had not been let
out by himself.
1