Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.50 seconds)Section 439 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Padmabati Dasi vs Rasik Lal Dhar on 21 December, 1909
In Padmabati Dasi v. Rasik Lal Dhar [1910] ILR 37 Cal 259,
Jenkins C.J. and Woodroffee J. observed :
The State Of Bombay vs Purushottam Jog Naik on 26 May, 1952
This enunciation of the principle was endorsed by the Supreme Court in State of Bombay v. Purushottam Jog Naik, AIR 1952 SC 317.
Durga Das Das vs Nalin Chandra Nandan And Ors. on 9 March, 1934
There is a catena of decided cases supporting this proposition and among others, reference may be made to Durga Das v. Nalin Chandra Nandan, AIR 1934 Cal 694, Bisakha Rani Ghose v. Satish Chandra Roy Singha, AIR 1956 Cal 496, and Dipendra Nath Sarkar v. State of Bihar, AIR 1962 Pat 101."
Bhupinder Singh vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 13 March, 1968
9. Rule 18 says that every affidavit shall be signed by the deponent and sworn to in the manner prescribed by the Code or by the rules and practice of the court. Order 19, Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure says that affidavits shall be confined to such facts as the deponent is able to prove from his own knowledge except on interlocutory applications, on which statements of his belief may be admitted. From the aforesaid rules, it is evident that the petition for winding up is required to be accompanied by an affidavit in due form. It is well-settled that if an affidavit is not in due form, no value can be attached to it. In the above view, I am fortified by the observations in Bhupinder Singh's case, AIR 1968 P & H 406, wherein Tek Chand J., after noticing Order 19, rule 3(1) of the Code, observed as follows (p. 410):
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
The Representation of the People Act, 1951
Section 433 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Bisakha Rani Ghose vs Satish Chandra Roy Singha And Ors. on 10 March, 1955
There is a catena of decided cases supporting this proposition and among others, reference may be made to Durga Das v. Nalin Chandra Nandan, AIR 1934 Cal 694, Bisakha Rani Ghose v. Satish Chandra Roy Singha, AIR 1956 Cal 496, and Dipendra Nath Sarkar v. State of Bihar, AIR 1962 Pat 101."