Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.20 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 114 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Sanjay Kumar Agarwal vs State Tax Officer (1) on 31 October, 2023
In that regard the decision of the Apex Court in Sanjay
Kumar Agarwal v. State Tax Officer [(2024) 2 SCC 362]
was placed reliance on. The learned Standing Counsel further
submitted that a similar question was considered by this Court
in O.P.(KAT) No.293 of 2024. Although the Department was
different, application of Rule 2(13) of Part I of KS&SSR was
2025:KER:38467
9
R.P.No.1223 of 2024 in O.P.(KAT) No.349 of 2024 &
R.P.No.1169 of 2024 in O.P.(KAT) No.367 of 2024
the question for consideration. There the notification of the
PSC for recruitment by transfer and fixing the qualification for
the same have been upheld. It is pointed out that a review
application filed in that matter was turned down as well.
Accordingly, the learned Standing Counsel would submit that
these applications are liable only to be dismissed. The Senior
Government Pleader supported the stand taken by the learned
Standing Counsel.
Parsion Devi & Ors vs Sumitri Devi & Ors on 14 October, 1997
In Parsion Devi v. Sumitri Devi [(1997) 8 SCC
715], the Apex Court made very pivotal observations:-
M/S Shanti Conductors (P) Ltd vs Assam State Electricity Board on 18 December, 2019
In Shanti Conductors Private Limited v. Assam
State Electricity Board [(2020) 2 SCC 677], a three Judge
Bench of the Apex Court following Parsion Devi [(1997) 8
SCC 715] dismissed the review applications holding that the
scope of review is limited and under the guise of review, the
petitioner cannot be permitted to reagitate and reargue the
questions which have already been addressed and decided.
Shri Ram Sahu (Dead) Through Lrs vs Vinod Kumar Rawat on 3 November, 2020
9. Later, in Shri Ram Sahu (Dead) Through Legal
Representatives v. Vinod Kumar Rawat [(2021) 13 SCC
1], the Apex Court restated the law with regard to the scope
of review under Section 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 of
the CPC.
Section 114 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
K.M. Krishna Reddy vs Vinod Reddy on 6 October, 2023
4. The essential contentions raised in support of the
plea for review are that the feeder categories eligible for
applying for appointment to the post of Assistant Professor in
Nursing as per Annexure A1 notification were from two
different departments, namely, Department of Medical
Education and Department of Health Services and the law
applicable was the one laid down in Sreejith K.K. v. Vinod
[2019 (1) KHC 261]. But this court departed from the said
principle and that occasioned in holding in the common
judgement that those whose probation was declared could
alone apply.
1