Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.70 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 392 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Mano Dutt & Anr vs State Of U.P on 29 February, 2012
In the judgment delivered by Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter
titled as "Mano Dutt & Anr. Vs. State of U.P." reported at 2012 III AD
(SC) 253, it has been held as under:
"xxxxx
In our view, nonexamination of Nankoo, to which the
accused raised the objection, would not materially affect the
case of the prosecution. Normally, an injured witness would
enjoy greater credibility because he is the sufferer himself
and thus, there will be no occasion for such a person to state
an incorrect version of the occurrence, or to involve anybody
falsely and in the bargain, protect the real culprit. We need
not discuss more elaborately the weight age that should be
attached by the Court to the testimony of an injured witness.
In fact, this aspect of criminal jurisprudence is no more res
integra, as has been consistently stated by this Court in
uniform language. Xxxxxx"
Section 207 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 394 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Abdul Sayeed vs State Of M.P on 14 September, 2010
In another judgment delivered in the matter titled as "Abdul
Sayeed Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh" reported at 2010 IX AD (S.C) 615,
Hon'ble Apex Court has held as under:
"xxxxxx
1