Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.29 seconds)

Bose Abraham vs State Of Kerala & Anr on 1 February, 2001

15. Bearing in mind the aforesaid definition, it is found from the insurance policy (Exhibit-B) that the vehicle is a fork lift truck having a chassis number. D.W.1 in his cross- examination stated that the fork lift truck has big wheels on the back side and medium wheel on the front side. Thus it is not in dispute that the fork lift truck is fitted with wheels to move from one place to other. Therefore, the fork lift truck is adapted for use on roads. Admittedly, the said vehicle has been registered under the Motor Vehicles Act. D.W.1 has also admitted in cross-examination that the offending vehicle is a motor vehicle under the Motor Vehicle Act and can move on its own. From the above materials it goes without saying that the offending vehicle is a motor vehicle under the Motor Vehicles Act. I find substance in the submission of Mr. Banik, learned advocate for respondent no. 1 relying on Bose Abraham (supra), P. Kothandam (supra) and Anjutai (supra) in this regard."
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 44 - S R Babu - Full Document

Government Of A.P. And Anr. vs Road Rollers Owners Welfare ... on 6 April, 2004

5. On the same line, Mr. Shresth Gautam, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 5 and 6 further relied upon the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Government of A.P. and another v. Road Rollers Owners Welfare Association and others, reported in (2004) 6 SCC 210. He refers paragraph 4 of the said judgment, which reads as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 49 - Full Document
1   2 Next