Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (4.57 seconds)
Date Of Decision: 27.05.2025 vs State Of H.P. And Others on 27 May, 2025 cites

Kapura Ram & Ors. vs . State Of H.P. & Ors. on 15 October, 2022

18. Resolution otherwise pressed into service by Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Mukesh Sharma, learned counsel representing respondent No.3 is of 12.12.2023, whereas record clearly reveals that prayer for his being 2025:HHC:16225 -13- enrolled as a Member of respondent No.3-Society was initially made in the year 2022, when similar situate person had approached this Court by way of CWP No.5392 of 2022, titled Kapura Ram and Others Vs. State of H.P. and Others, wherein prayer made on behalf of the petitioner for impleadment was rejected, but liberty was reserved to him to approach Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Solan, for redressal of his grievance. Pursuant to afore direction, petitioner immediately approached Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Solan, who thereafter called upon Regulatory Committee to examine the issue, but as has been discussed hereinabove, Regulatory Committee while misinterpreting the definition of family, as given in Section 2(8) of the Act, rejected the claim of the petitioner.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

Hem Raj And Others vs State Of H.P. And Others on 28 December, 2016

15. Taking note of aforesaid judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court, this Court had an occasion to deal with a similar issue in case titled as Hem Raj and Others Vs. State of H.P. and Others, CWP No.2173 of 2016, decided on 16.03.2024. Since similar plea, as has been raised in the present case, was also raised in afore case, this Court finds it profitable to reproduce relevant Paras of afore judgment, for clear understanding of the controversy as well as order passed by this Court, which reads as under:
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 241 - Full Document

Nirmala Devi vs Deputy Commissioner Cum Collector, Ut ... on 3 August, 2023

14. Plea set-up by learned Additional Advocate General as well as Mr. Mukesh Sharma, learned counsel representing respondent No.3 has already been negated by Division Bench of this Court in case titled as Nirmala Devi Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Solan and Others, CWP No.4040 of 2021, decided on 16.09.2021, whereby Division Bench of this Court while deprecating the action of Regulatory Committee for changing the definition of 'family' as per Section 2(8) of the Act, observed that, 'family' means husband, wife and unmarried son and daughter. Order dated 26.03.2010 passed by Regulatory Committee was modified and Division Bench categorically held that definition of 'family', as contained in that order shall essentially be read as the one defined in Section 2(8) of the Act, meaning thereby, family would necessarily comprise of husband, wife and unmarried sons and daughters.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next