Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (1.00 seconds)Section 8 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 88 in The Indian Trusts Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Mr. Ram Kumar Gupta vs O/O The Addl. Distt Magistrate ... on 25 November, 2009
5. CIC has held in the order dated 30.10.09 in the case of Shri
R. K. Gupta vs. Addl. Director of Income Tax (Vigilance) that Section 8(1)
Krishna Gopal Kakani vs Bank Of Baroda on 30 September, 2008
In a recent decision (Mr. Krishna Gopal Kakani v. Bank of
Baroda 2008 (13) SCALE 160) the Supreme Court had to decide
whether a transaction resulted in a fiduciary relationship. Money
was sought to be recovered by the plaintiff, from a bank, who had
moved the court for auction of goods imported, and retained the
proceeds; the trail court overruled the objection to maintainability,
stating that the bank held the surplus (of the proceeds) in a
fiduciary capacity. The High Court upset the trial court's findings,
ruling that the bank did not act in a fiduciary capacity. The Supreme
Court affirmed the High Court's findings. The court noticed Section
88 of the Trusts Act, which reads as follows:
Section 20 in The Guardians And Wards Act, 1890 [Entire Act]
The Cpio, Supreme Court Of India, Tilak ... vs Subhash Chandra Agarwal & Anr. on 2 September, 2009
- Supreme Court of India vs. Subhash Chandra Agrawal. This decision has
also been relied upon in subsequent decisions of the Delhi High Court.