Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.31 seconds)Section 68 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 114 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Bharpur Singh & Ors vs Shamsher Singh on 12 December, 2008
b. It is the case of the plaintiff that one of the attesting witness
namely, Dr. Mihir Kumar Dutta died on 25th May, 2014 and was
the family doctor but it is impossible to believe that the said
attesting witness even after the death of the testatrix on 23rd
January, 1993, has not disclosed about the execution of the Will
by the testatrix on 18th July, 1986 to any of the family members.
c. In the case of Bharpur Singh & Ors. vs. Shamsher Singh
reported in (2009) 3 SCC 687, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held
that :
Section 69 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Murthy vs C.Saradambal on 10 December, 2021
j. In the case of Murthy & Ors. vs. C. Saradambal & Ors. reported
in (2022) 3 SCC 209 , the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that:
The Hindu Succession Act, 1956
Moturu Nalini Kanth vs Gainedi Kaliprasad (Dead) on 17 March, 2021
and each of the witnesses shall sign the Will
in the presence of the testator, but it shall not
be necessary that more than one witness be
present at the same time, and no particular
form of attestation shall be necessary."
h. In the case of Moturu Nalini Kanth vs. Gainedi Kaliprasad
(Dead, Through Lrs.) reported in 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1488,
the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that :
H. Venkatachala Iyengar vs B. N. Thimmajamma & Others on 13 November, 1958
In paragraph 20 of the said judgment, the Hon'ble Supreme Court
held that: