Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.18 seconds)Elel Hotels And Investments Limitedand ... vs Union Of India on 2 May, 1989
In the
case of The Elel Hotel and Investments Ltd. and Anr
(Supra) the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed that the
cardinal rule of interpretation is that the entries in the
legislative lists are not to be read in a narrow or restricted
sense and that each general word should be held to extend to
all ancillary or subsidiary matters which can fairly and
Page 11 of 12
HC-NIC Page 11 of 12 Created On Sun Aug 13 08:31:36 IST 2017
O/TAXAP/46/2017 JUDGMENT
reasonably be said to be comprehended in it. It is further
observed that the widest possible construction, according to
the ordinary meaning of the words in the entry, must be put
upon them.
Assistant Collector Of Central Excise, ... vs Ramdev Tobacco Company on 25 January, 1991
Collector of Central
Excise, Guntur Vs. Ramdev Tobaco Company reported in
AIR 1991 SC 506.
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
1