Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.53 seconds)The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957
The Punjab Municipal Act, 1999
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 477 in The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 478 in The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Mahinder Singh And Ors. vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 7 December, 1987
15. The judgment relied upon by learned counsel for the
appellant reported in the case of Mahinder Singh (supra) does not
apply to the facts of the instant case. In the instant case, it has
categorically been established by the oral testimony of DW-2 , DW-
3 and DW-4 that show cause notice had been served upon the
person concerned.
Section 41 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Surjit Kaur on 27 October, 1971
22. Admittedly prior to the year 1957 the Punjab Municipal Act
was in force and the NDMC was the administrator and in charge of
the disputed property. Thereafter the area under dispute had been
transferred to the MCD after the enactment of the Delhi Municipal
Corporation Act 1957. It is not the contention of the appellant that
there was no valid transfer of the liability from the NDMC to the
MCD. The MCD had taken over the administration of the disputed
area i.e. the area falling in the Sunder Nagar Market area with
effect from 1957. There is no evidence to show that this
construction was prior to 1957; the first Appellate Court had
endorsed the finding of the Trial Judge on issue no.2 that the
testimony of the witnesses of the defence had proved that the
unauthorized construction was made after 1957. As such the
judgment reported in Surjit Kaur (supra) would have no application
in which case admittedly the unauthorized construction had been
incurred prior to the year 1957.