Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.30 seconds)Section 336 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 337 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 427 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990
8. Given the varied nature of cases that come before
the High Courts, any strict test as to when the court's
extraordinary powers can be exercised is likely to tie
the court's hands in the face of future injustices. This
Court in State of Haryana v Bhajan Lal conducted a
detailed study of the situations where the court may
exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction and laid down a
list of illustrative examples of where quashing may be
appropriate. It is not necessary to discuss all the
::: Downloaded on - 20/09/2024 20:35:28 :::CIS
2024:HHC:8597
15
examples, but a few bear relevance to the present
case. The court in Bhajan Lal noted that quashing
may be appropriate where, (2007) 12 SCC 1 1992
Supp (1) SCC 335
.
Prashant Bharti vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 January, 2013
In the aforesaid
judgment titled as Prashant Bharti v. State (NCT of Delhi), (2013) 9
SCC 293, the Hon'ble Apex Court has held as under:-
Section 425 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Pramod Suryabhan Pawar vs The State Of Maharashtra on 21 August, 2019
15. The Hon'ble Apex Court in case titled Pramod Suryabhan
Pawar v. The State of Maharashtra and Anr, (2019) 9 SCC 608,
has elaborated the scope of exercise of power under Section 482
Cr.PC, the relevant para whereof reads as under:-
Inder Mohan Goswami & Another vs State Of Uttaranchal & Others on 9 October, 2007
Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC
though wide have to be exercised sparingly,
carefully and with great caution and only when
exercise is justified by the tests specifically laid
down in this section itself. Authority of the
court exists for the advancement of justice. If
any abuse of the process leading to injustice is
brought to the notice of the court, then the court
would be justified in preventing injustice by
invoking inherent powers in absence of specific
provisions in the statute."