Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 24 (0.24 seconds)Section 25F in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 25G in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
B.S. Minhas vs Indian Statistical Institute & Ors on 19 October, 1983
20.Reliance has been placed upon judgements delivered in Govt. of
N.C.T. of Delhi v. Hospital Employees Union, Delhi, reported as
(1997) 2 LLJ 516 (Del); B.S. Minhas v. Indian Statistical
Institute, reported as (1983) 4 SCC 582; Estralla Rubber v. Dass
Estate (P) Ltd., reported as (2001) 8 SCC 97; Bhagwati Prasad
v. Delhi State Mineral Development Corpn., reported as (1990)
1 SCC 36.
M/S. Estralla Rubber vs Dass Estate (Private) Ltd on 12 September, 2001
20.Reliance has been placed upon judgements delivered in Govt. of
N.C.T. of Delhi v. Hospital Employees Union, Delhi, reported as
(1997) 2 LLJ 516 (Del); B.S. Minhas v. Indian Statistical
Institute, reported as (1983) 4 SCC 582; Estralla Rubber v. Dass
Estate (P) Ltd., reported as (2001) 8 SCC 97; Bhagwati Prasad
v. Delhi State Mineral Development Corpn., reported as (1990)
1 SCC 36.
Bhagwati Prasad And Ors vs Delhi State Mineral Development ... on 15 December, 1989
20.Reliance has been placed upon judgements delivered in Govt. of
N.C.T. of Delhi v. Hospital Employees Union, Delhi, reported as
(1997) 2 LLJ 516 (Del); B.S. Minhas v. Indian Statistical
Institute, reported as (1983) 4 SCC 582; Estralla Rubber v. Dass
Estate (P) Ltd., reported as (2001) 8 SCC 97; Bhagwati Prasad
v. Delhi State Mineral Development Corpn., reported as (1990)
1 SCC 36.
Mukand Ltd vs Mukand Staff & Officers Association on 10 March, 2004
24. On a bare reading of the reference, it is evident that the term of
reference was specifically limited to the question of violation of
Section 25 of the I.D. Act. However, the learned Labour Court
adjudicated the matter and concluded that the workman is
entitled to absorption in service as a peon. In answering the
reference, the learned Labour Court appears to have digressed
from the arena of reference and may have been influenced by the
1988 Settlement entered between the Bank and the employee
union. As per the term of reference, the issue was only and only
limited to the violation of Section 25 of the I.D. Act by the
Petitioner/Management. The reference did not contain any
mention of violation of terms of 1988 Settlement. As held by
Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Mukand Limited Vs Mukand Staff &
Officers reported as 2004 (10) SCC 460, „the Industrial Tribunal
is a creature of reference, it cannot adjudicate the matters which
are not within the purview of the dispute actually referred to it by
the order of reference'. The Tribunal cannot deviate from the
area of the reference and cannot get influenced by the other
issues not explicitly forming the subject matter of the term of
reference.