Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.50 seconds)
Nitin Yohan Arawade vs Central Bank Of Inda Through General ... on 4 August, 2021 cites

State Bank Of India & Anr vs Raj Kumar on 8 February, 2010

8. The learned advocate representing the respondent Bank draws our attention to the affidavit in reply dated 29.01.2021 filed by the Chief Manager of the respondent Bank. He submits that though the impugned order does not even refer to the earlier employment of the petitioner, this aspect cannot be lost sight of since one member of the family was already employed elsewhere. He then submits that the compassionate ::: Uploaded on - 13/08/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 25/09/2021 03:11:18 ::: *6* 914wp12352o18 appointment cannot be granted to a person since he does not have special right or claim in view of the judicial pronouncement in the State Bank of India vs. Raj Kumar, 2010 (11) SCC 661 . It is conceded that the father of the petitioner had met with an accident in March, 2014. Since he was eligible for VRS due to medical incapacitation, he was relieved from service on 25.06.2015. It is further stated that the compassionate appointment scheme which applies even to an employee, who has obtained VRS due to medical incapacitation, was introduced w.e.f. 05.08.2014. The concerned employee was relieved from employment on 25.06.2015. However, since it was noted that the family of the petitioner had received retiral benefits and was not indigent, the application of the petitioner was rejected.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 861 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1