Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.29 seconds)
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited vs Electricity Generation Incorporation ... on 17 October, 2017 cites

M/S South East Asia Shipping Co. Ltd vs M/S Nav Bharat Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & ... on 13 March, 1996

In the decision reported as (1996) 3 SCC 443 South East Asia Shipping Co. Ltd. v. Nav Bharat Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. noting that the contract between the parties was executed at Bombay and had to be performed at Bombay, it was held that merely because the bank guarantee was executed by a bank at Delhi in terms of the mother contract would not constitute a cause of action at Delhi to a lay a suit to injunct the bank from paying under the guarantee and to restrain the beneficiary from FAO (OS) (COMM) 184 & 185/2017 Page 11 of 13 enforcing the right under the guarantee.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 192 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Union Bank Of India vs Seppo Rally Oy And Ors on 23 September, 1999

Concerning jurisdiction under the Consumer Protection Act, in the decision reported as (1999) 8 SCC 357 Union Bank of India v. Seppo Rally OY the Supreme Court held that the consumer fora at the place where the office of the party at whose instance the bank guarantee was furnished would have no jurisdiction to entertain a complaint concerning the bank guarantee furnished by the branch of the bank from the place where the office of the party concerned was situated."
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 36 - D P Wadhwa - Full Document

Modi Entertainment Network & Anr vs W.S.G.Cricket Pte. Ltd on 21 January, 2003

In fact, in paragraph 11 of Modi Entertainment Network (supra), the Supreme Court had referred to the well settled principle that by agreement the parties cannot confer jurisdiction, where none exists, on a court to which the Code applies, but cautioned that this principle would not apply when the parties agree to submit to the exclusive or non-exclusive jurisdiction of a foreign court. It was held that in such cases, the English Courts do permit invoking of their jurisdiction. Thus, it was held that the parties to contract may agree to have their disputes resolved by a foreign court termed as a 'neutral court' or 'court of choice' creating exclusive or non-exclusive jurisdiction.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 134 - S S Quadri - Full Document
1   2 Next