Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 45 (0.33 seconds)Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section 378 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Basalingappa vs Mudibasappa on 9 April, 2019
"23. We having noticed the ratio laid down by this Court in
the above cases on Sections 118(a) and 139, we now
summarise the principles enumerated by this Court in
following manner:
M/S. Modi Cements Ltd vs Shri Kuchil Kumar Nandi on 2 March, 1998
9.1 In the decision in Kumar Exports (supra), as relied by the
learned advocate for the respondent No. 1, the Apex Court has
observed that, "fact that cheque pertained to goods supplied to
appellant was denied by appellant stating that complainant had
stopped manufacture of goods called for and no supply was
made - held that when contrary not proved by respondent,
presumption stood rebutted, hence, there could be no case for
conviction".
Girishbhai Natvarbhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat And Anr. on 25 November, 2005
11) Girishbhai Narvarbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat
and Another, 2006 (1) GLR 786;
Rameshbhai Chandubhai Rathod vs State Of Gujarat on 27 April, 2009
12) M/s. Prajapati Oil Industry through its owner
Rameshbhai v. State of Gujarat, 2004 (1) GLH
365;
Vijay vs Laxman & Anr on 7 February, 2013
13) Mahendra A. Dadia and Others v. State of
Maharashtra and Antoher, 1998 SCC OnLine
Bom 140;
14) Vijay v. Laxman and Another, (2013) 3 SCC 86;
15) V. Sampath v. Praveen Chandra V. Shah and
Another, 1999 Cri.L.J. 936.
Pravin Chandra Murarji Savla vs Meghji Murji Shah And Anr. on 27 August, 1997
13) Mahendra A. Dadia and Others v. State of
Maharashtra and Antoher, 1998 SCC OnLine
Bom 140;
14) Vijay v. Laxman and Another, (2013) 3 SCC 86;
15) V. Sampath v. Praveen Chandra V. Shah and
Another, 1999 Cri.L.J. 936.