Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)

Rohtash Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 29 May, 2013

37.PW-7 Sh. Madan Lal who was a truck driver and PW-8 Sh. Prakash Chand, Retd. Deputy Secretary have not supported the prosecution version at all and were declared hostile by the Ld. APP for the State. Though they were thoroughly cross-examined by Ld. APP for the State, but nothing beneficial to the prosecution has emerged out of the same and, therefore, their statements are not of any help to the prosecution. Though, it is a settled law that evidence of a hostile witness cannot be discarded completely as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Rohtash Kumar v. State of Haryana (2013) 14 SCC 434, however, in the present case, PW-7 and PW-8 have not stated anything incriminating against the accused persons and thus, their statement do not help the prosecution.
Supreme Court of India Cites 40 - Cited by 406 - B S Chauhan - Full Document
1