Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.22 seconds)

Suresh Sitaram Surve vs State Of Maharashtra on 25 November, 2002

24. Learned A.G.A. for the State has stated that the prosecution has proved the case beyond reasonable doubt on the basis of oral and documentary evidence. The Apex Court has held in Suresh Sitaram Surve Vs. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2003 SC 344 that the evidence of an injured eye-witness cannot be discarded in toto on the ground of inimical disposition towards the accused particularly where his evidence when tested in the light of broad probabilities, it can be concluded that he was natural eye-witness and had no reason to concoct a case against the accused.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 20 - P V Reddi - Full Document
1   2 Next