Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.81 seconds)The Gujarat University Act, 1949
Section 406 in The Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 [Entire Act]
Chatter Singh Baid And Ors. vs Corporation Of Calcutta And Ors. on 1 June, 1983
It will be seen that clause (d) aforesaid was in
similar terms as clause (e) of Section 406(2) as it
originally existed. Bombay High Court upheld the
constitutional validity of Section 217 of the Bombay
Municipal Corporation Act. Calcutta High Court in Chhatter
Singh Baid & Ors. vs. Corporation of Calcutta & Ors. [AIR
1984 Cal. 283] also took the same view. There it was
sub-section (3A) of Section 183 of the Calcutta Municipal
Act, 1951 which provided
No appeal under this section shall be entertained
unless the consolidated rate payable up to the date of
presentation of the appeal on the valuation determined
Shyam Kishore And Others vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi And ... on 3 September, 1992
A Full Bench of the Delhi High Court, by majority,
upheld the constitutional validity of the aforesaid
provision though there was also challenge to the same based
on Article 14 of the Constitution. Appeal against the
judgment of the Delhi High Court was taken to this Court
which upheld the view of the Delhi High Court. The decision
of this Court is reported as Shyam Kishore and Ors. vs.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr. [(1993) 1 SCC 22].
Vijay Prakash D. Mehta & Anr vs Collector Of Customs (Preventive), ... on 16 August, 1988
Reference was also made to another
decision of this Court in Vijay Prakash D. Mehta/Shri
Jawahar D. Mehta vs. Collector of Customs (Preventive),
Bombay [(1988) 4 SCC 402] where Justice Sabyasachi Mukharji,
J., speaking for the Court, said :
Elora Construction Company vs The Municipal Corporation Of Gr. Bombay ... on 22 February, 1979
In M/s. Elora Construction Company vs. Municipal
Corporation of Greater Bombay & Ors. [AIR 1980 Bom.162],
the question before the Bombay High Court was as to the
validity of Section 217 of the Bombay Municipal Corporations
Act. This Section provided for filing of appeal against any
rateable value or tax fixed or charged under that Act but no
such appeal could be entertained unless :
The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957
Section 217 in The Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 [Entire Act]
Ganga Bai vs Vijay Kumar & Ors on 9 April, 1974
This Court relied on its earlier decisions in Ganga Bai case
and Anant Mills case.