Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.24 seconds)The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Section 74 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Thyssen Stahlunion Gmbh Etc vs Steel Authority Of India Ltd on 7 October, 1999
In Thyssen Stahlunion GMBH v. Steel Authority of India Ltd. (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court while interpreting Section 85(2)(a) of the Act of 1996 held as follows:
Section 8 in The General Clauses Act, 1897 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Section 17 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Bhagat Ram Sharma vs Union Of India & Ors on 13 November, 1987
In Bhagat Ram Sharma v. Union of India , the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that it is a matter of legislative practice to provide while enacting an amending law, that an existing provision shall be deleted and a new provision is substituted. Such deletion has the effect of repeal of the existing provision. Such a law also may provide for the introduction of a new provision. There is no real distinction between a repeal and an amendment.
Interstate Equipment (India) Private ... vs Bharat Aluminum Company Limited on 3 March, 2004
In the present case, the words used in Clause 33 are "Act, 1940 or any statutory amendments thereof" and applying the principles laid down in the above judgment, it is very clear that only the new Act would apply and, therefore, the entire proceedings are within the jurisdiction.