Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.53 seconds)State Of West Bengal And Ors vs Sujit Kumar Rana on 20 January, 2004
In support of his submission the learned advocate referred
to the decision in the case of State of West Bengal and Ors Vs. Sujit
State Of West Bengal & Anr vs Mahua Sarkar on 27 February, 2008
20.wp.838.19.odt
Kumar Rana; (2004) 4 Supreme Court Cases 129, State of West
Bengal Vs. Mahua Sarkar; AIR 2008 Supreme Court 1591, Mohd.
Ashique Vs. State of Maharashtra; AIR 2009 (SC) 624, and an
unreported judgment of the Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal
No.524/2019 (Special Leave Petition) (Crl) No.2001/2012 in the
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Udaysing decided on 26.03.2019.
Section 2 in Indian Forest Act, 1927 [Entire Act]
Section 52 in Indian Forest Act, 1927 [Entire Act]
Forest Rules
Mohd. Ashique vs State Of Maharashtra on 18 November, 2008
20.wp.838.19.odt
Kumar Rana; (2004) 4 Supreme Court Cases 129, State of West
Bengal Vs. Mahua Sarkar; AIR 2008 Supreme Court 1591, Mohd.
Ashique Vs. State of Maharashtra; AIR 2009 (SC) 624, and an
unreported judgment of the Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal
No.524/2019 (Special Leave Petition) (Crl) No.2001/2012 in the
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Udaysing decided on 26.03.2019.
Forest Development Corporation Of ... vs Prakash Mallesh Cheraku And Another on 9 January, 2018
The
learned advocate also referred to the judgments of the Coordinate
Bench of this Court in Forest Development Corporation of
Maharashtra Ltd. Vs. Prakash Mallesh Cheraku in Criminal Writ
Petition No.738 of 2017 decided on 09.01.2018, Kavita Sandip
Tandel Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors, in Criminal Writ
Petition No.3678 of 2013 decided on 23.03.2015.
Kavita Sandip Tandel vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 23 March, 2015
20.wp.838.19.odt
of Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. and in Kavita
Sandip Tandel (supra) clearly lay down and interpret the provision and
I find no sufficient and cogent reason but to agree with the
observations that it is the burden on the owner of the vehicle to prove
that the vehicle was so used without his knowledge.
1