Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.79 seconds)
For The vs Shri Ratanlal Singh] And on 22 December, 2011 cites

Kunhayammed & Ors vs State Of Kerala & Anr on 19 July, 2000

26. The argument of Mr. Bagchi on the doctrine of merger can be answered by referring to the decision of the Supreme Court reported in AIR 2000 SC 2587 (Kunhayammed v. State of Kerala). This decision discusses in detail when a judgment and/or order of a subordinate Court or tribunal would merge in the order of the Supreme Court. It would be profitable to quote the relevant passages, reading as under :
Supreme Court of India Cites 36 - Cited by 1157 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

State Of Punjab vs Darshan Singh on 29 October, 2003

19. He also contends that the remedy of the opposite party lies in obtaining a clarification from the Supreme Court. Relying on the decisions of the Supreme Court reported in AIR 1974 SC 1380 [M/s. Gojer Brothers (P) Ltd. v. Shri Ratanlal Singh] and AIR 2003 Supreme Court 4179 (State of Punjab v. Darshan Singh), he urges that the effective decree as it stands today is that of the higher appellate Court and nothing can be inserted in the decree at this stage.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 108 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1