Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.26 seconds)Amad Giri vs Mst. Begha on 7 March, 1955
where Govinda Menon J., following the decision of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir in Ahmad Giri v. Mst. Begha AIR 1955 J & K 1 : 1955 Cri LJ 1067 has held that the woman must be a wife at the time of filing the application under Section 488 of the Code. The learned Judge has pointed out that, under the personal law. she might be entitled to maintenance for the period of iddat. but she can have that only in a Civil Court and not under Section 488 of the Criminal Procedure Code, if she was not a wife at the time of filing the petition.
Areekkal Abdurahiman Musaliyar vs Neliyaparambath Ayissu on 30 October, 1961
This conclusion of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate appears to be erroneous, in view of the very language of Section 488 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and more so. in view of the decision of this Court in Abdurahiman Musaliyar v. Neliyaparambath Ayissu .
1