cites: 177458629

Section 155 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 2719

Satish Mehra vs State Of N.C.T. Of Delhi And Anr on 22 November, 2012

In Satish Mehru Vs. State (N.C.T of Delhi) and another 2012 (13) SCC 614 -, the Hon'ble Apex Court in para 21 has held as follows:-

Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 267 - R Gogoi - Full Document

A. R. Antulay vs Ramdas Sriniwas Nayak And Another on 16 February, 1984

25. Though several authorities have been cited by the Party-in-Person, Page No:20/23 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl. O.P. No. 15514 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.Nos.9691 of 2017 much emphasis was made on the decision reported in A.R.Antulay Vs. Ramdas Sriniwas Nayak and Ors AIR 1984 SC 718, wherein it is held that punishment of the offender in the interest of Society being one of the objects behind penal statutes enacted for larger good of the Society, right to initiate proceedings cannot be whittled down, circumscribed or fettered by putting it into a strait-jacket formula of locus standi unknown to criminal jurisprudence, save and except specific statutory exception. Further, there is no dispute to the proposition laid down in several authorities relied on by him before the Court. But the fact remains that this Court satisfies itself the entire prosecution is initiated in order to wreck vengeance against Trust member due to civil disputes.

Supreme Court of India Cites 61 - Cited by 478 - D A Desai - Full Document

State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990

In 1992 SUPP (1) SUPREME COURT CASES – 335 STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Vs. BHAJAN LAL AND OTHERS, the Hon'ble Apex Court has set out the following guidelines for quashing the complaint.

Supreme Court of India Cites 44 - Cited by 19733 - S R Pandian - Full Document