Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.40 seconds)
Surinder Kumar vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 22 April, 2024 cites

K.Manjusree Etc vs State Of A.P & Anr on 15 February, 2008

"23. So far as the ratio of the decision in the case of K. Manjusree (supra) is concerned, that authority deals with change of the Rules mid-way. In the case before us, in our opinion, if the High Court is permitted to alter the selection criteria after the performance of individual candidates is assessed, that would constitute alteration of the laid down Rules. We refer to paragraphs Nos.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 638 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

P.K. Ramachandra Iyer & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 16 December, 1983

Therefore, introduction of the requirement of minimum marks for interview, after the entire selection process (consisting of written examination and interview) was completed, would amount to changing the rules of the game after the game was played which is clearly impermissible. We are fortified in this view by several decisions of this Court. It is sufficient to refer to three of them - Ρ.Κ. Ramachandra Iyer v. Union of India, Umesh Chandra Shukla v. Union of India, and Durgacharan Misra v. State of Orissa.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 396 - D A Desai - Full Document

Umesh Chandra Shukla Etc. Etc vs Union Of India & Ors on 2 August, 1985

Therefore, introduction of the requirement of minimum marks for interview, after the entire selection process (consisting of written examination and interview) was completed, would amount to changing the rules of the game after the game was played which is clearly impermissible. We are fortified in this view by several decisions of this Court. It is sufficient to refer to three of them - Ρ.Κ. Ramachandra Iyer v. Union of India, Umesh Chandra Shukla v. Union of India, and Durgacharan Misra v. State of Orissa.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 277 - E S Venkataramiah - Full Document

Durgacharan Misra vs State Of Orissa & Ors on 27 August, 1987

Therefore, introduction of the requirement of minimum marks for interview, after the entire selection process (consisting of written examination and interview) was completed, would amount to changing the rules of the game after the game was played which is clearly impermissible. We are fortified in this view by several decisions of this Court. It is sufficient to refer to three of them - Ρ.Κ. Ramachandra Iyer v. Union of India, Umesh Chandra Shukla v. Union of India, and Durgacharan Misra v. State of Orissa.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 267 - K J Shetty - Full Document
1