Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.19 seconds)Section 42 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Sheth Maneklal Mansukhbhai vs Messrs. Hormusji Jamshedji ... on 21 March, 1950
9. As discussed above all the four conditions are satisfied in the present case. The other cases referred to by Mr. Sankatha Rai in this context were Maneklal Mansukhbhai v. Hormusji Jamshedji Ginwalla & Sons, (AIR 1950 SC 1), B. P. Sinha v. Som Nath, (AIR 1971 All 297) and Technicians Studio Pvt. Ltd. v. Smt. Lila Ghosh, (AIR 1977 SC 2425). These cases do not advance the plaintiff-respondent's case any further on this point.
B.P. Sinha vs Som Nath on 16 July, 1970
9. As discussed above all the four conditions are satisfied in the present case. The other cases referred to by Mr. Sankatha Rai in this context were Maneklal Mansukhbhai v. Hormusji Jamshedji Ginwalla & Sons, (AIR 1950 SC 1), B. P. Sinha v. Som Nath, (AIR 1971 All 297) and Technicians Studio Pvt. Ltd. v. Smt. Lila Ghosh, (AIR 1977 SC 2425). These cases do not advance the plaintiff-respondent's case any further on this point.
Ram Lochan vs Mahadeo Prasad Singh And Ors. on 4 May, 1970
Sobha Ram's case relied upon by the learned counsel is, therefore, distinguishable.
Thota China Subha Rao vs Mattapalli Raju on 10 May, 1949
In Thota China Subba Rao v. Mattapalli Raju (AIR 1950 FC 1) it was held that the transferee was not entitled to the benefit of Section 53A as he was never put into possession of the property.
Section 11 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Technicians Studio Private Ltd vs Lila Ghosh & Anr on 19 September, 1977
9. As discussed above all the four conditions are satisfied in the present case. The other cases referred to by Mr. Sankatha Rai in this context were Maneklal Mansukhbhai v. Hormusji Jamshedji Ginwalla & Sons, (AIR 1950 SC 1), B. P. Sinha v. Som Nath, (AIR 1971 All 297) and Technicians Studio Pvt. Ltd. v. Smt. Lila Ghosh, (AIR 1977 SC 2425). These cases do not advance the plaintiff-respondent's case any further on this point.
Mahadeo Prasad Singh & Anr vs Ram Lochan & Ors on 16 September, 1980
6. Now so far as the first point is concerned, the matter seems to be concluded by the decision of a Full Bench of this Court in Ram Lochan v. Mahadeo Prasad Singh (AIR 1970 All 544) which has been affirmed and approved by the Supreme Court in Mahadeo Prasad Singh v. Ram Lochan (1980 All LJ 1019) : (AIR 1981 SC 416). The execution proceedings in which the share was purchased by Mangaroo were initiated before the
amendment of Section 42 of the Civil P. C. by U. P. Act No, 24 of 1954 that is, before 30th November, 1954.
Chaliagulla Ramachandrayya vs Boppana Satyanarayana & Others on 10 May, 1963
In Chaliagulla Ramachandrayya v. Boppana Satyanarayana (AIR 1964 SC 877) it was found that Section 53A had no applicability to the facts of that case.
1