Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.22 seconds)
State vs Soniya on 22 November, 2025 cites

State vs Soniya & Anr. on 27 November, 2019

It is correct that I did not hand over the seal to any independent public person. It is wrong to suggest that I did not do the same as accused is falsely implicated in the present case and case property is falsely planted upon her. It is correct that I did not make any seal handing over memo. It is wrong to suggest that I did not FIR NO. 900/2021 State Vs. Soniya 6 of 19 do the same as I did not hand over the seal to any person. It is wrong to suggest that I did not do my investigation in proper and fair manner. It is wrong to suggest that I prepared all the documents while sitting in PS only. It is wrong to suggest that I am deposing falsely."
Delhi High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 4 - Manmohan - Full Document

Safiullah vs State (Delhi Administration) on 9 November, 1992

25. As per evidence available on record, the seal after use was not given to any independent public person. Further, there is nothing on record to prove whether the said seal was ever deposited in the Malkhana of Police Station or not. In such case, tampering with case property can also not be ruled out. As a result, the benefit of doubt has to be given to the accused. Reliance is placed upon the decision in Safiullah v. State, (1993) 49 DLT 193, where the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi observed:
Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 1012 - Full Document
1   2 Next