Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.40 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 60 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Dolgobinda Paricha vs Nimai Charan Misra & Others on 27 April, 1959
The evidences of D.Ws.13, 21, 22, 27 and 33 are also on
the same point. They are co-villagers of Rajroop. D.W.14 is
Mateshari herself, the widow of Kumar. Now, from the above
evidences it becomes clear that the witnesses examined by the
defendants are co-villages, neighbours and even relations of the
parties and, therefore, in view of the decision of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in A.I.R. 1959 SC 914 (Dolgobinda Paricha Vs.
Nimai Charan Misra and others) the witnesses are expected to
have special means of knowledge being either the co-villager or the
neighbour or the relation. Therefore, their evidences are admissible.
The reasons assigned by the court below for discarding the evidences
of theses witnesses are neither sound nor tenable.
Section 99 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
1