Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.48 seconds)United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Rajammal And Ors. on 8 April, 1992
In 1993 Acc CJ 486, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajammal, a Division Bench of this Court relied upon the decision quoted in State of Kerala v. K. K. Padmavathi, 1983 Acc CJ 707 (Ker) and mainly relied on the following passage in 1983 Acc CJ 707 (cited supra).
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Rajasthan State Road Transport ... vs Kailash Nath Kothari & Ors. Etc. Etc on 3 September, 1997
17. The next case cited by the learned counsel is , Rajasthan State Rd. Trpt, Corporation v. Kallash Nath Kothari. In the said case, the Apex Court has held that RSRTC was liable to pay the compensation for the accident while the vehicle was in possession of RSRTC under agreement between the owner of the vehicle and RSRTC. The Tribunal and High Court of Rajasthan committed no error in fastening the liability to pay the compensation to the heirs of the deceased passengers on the RSRTC. In the said case, the Apex Court has held that person who had actual possession and control of vehicle contemporarily held liable for the negligence act of the driver under his control.
New Asiatic Insurance Co. Ltd vs Pessumal Dhanamal Aswani And Ors on 24 April, 1964
22. In , New Asiatic Ins. Co. v. Pessumal, it is a ease where the Supreme Court has held as follows (at p. 1739 of AIR) :
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs Durdadshya Kumar Samal And Ors. on 31 August, 1987
In National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Durdadashya K. Samal, a learned single Judge of the Orissa High Court has held as follows :
Guru Govekar vs Miss Filomena F. Lobo & Ors on 6 May, 1988
In , Guru Govekar v. Filomena F. Lobo, in paragraph 13, the Apex Court has held that once the insurer has issued a certificate of insurance in accordance with Sub-section (4) of Section 95 of the Act, the insurer had to satisfy any decree which a person receiving injuries from the use of the vehicle insured had obtained against any person insured by the policy. He was liable to satisfy the decree when he had been served with a notice under Sub-section (2) of Section 96 of the Motor Vehicles Act about the proceedings in which the judgment was delivered.
Muthu Thangiah Thevar Rice Mill vs Mariyayee And Ors. on 12 February, 1997
16. 1997 TNLJ 172 : (1997 AIHC 3836), Muthu Thangiah Thevar Rice Mill Ooranipuram, Orathanad Taluk (Thanjavur District) v. Mariyayee is also a Bench decision of our High Court. In the said case, a Tractor and Trailer were insured for use for agricultural purpose and forestry purposes. But, at the time of the accident, the Tractor and Trailer were not used for such purposes i.e. for taking drinking water on an emergency basis by Karambakudi Panchayat. The learned Judges have noted that admittedly the Tractor and Trailer were used on hire for carrying water for Karambakudi Panchayat, use of the Tractor and Trailer was not either for agricultural or forestry purposes. Therefore, the learned Judge have exonerated the Insurance Company.
The Oriental Fire & General Insurance ... vs Shankarbhai Punabhai And Anr. Etc. Etc. on 29 December, 1982
23. , Oriental F & G Insurance Co. v. Shankarbhai is decision of a Bench of the Gujarat High Court. The said case relates to the inter se dispute between the insurance company on the one hand and insurer on the other hand. This will only add, the insurance company is concerned its liability as per the provisions contained in Section 96.
State Of Kerala vs M. K. Krishnan Nair & Ors.Andk. ... on 14 February, 1978
In 1993 Acc CJ 486, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajammal, a Division Bench of this Court relied upon the decision quoted in State of Kerala v. K. K. Padmavathi, 1983 Acc CJ 707 (Ker) and mainly relied on the following passage in 1983 Acc CJ 707 (cited supra).