Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.27 seconds)Section 375 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 417 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar vs The State Of Maharashtra on 22 November, 2018
In Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar v. State of
Maharashtra,6 a two Judge Bench of this Court while
dealing with similar facts as the present case reiterated
the parameters laid down in Bhajan Lal (supra) held that:
Uday vs State Of Karnataka on 19 February, 2003
predominant reason for the victim girl to agree to
the sexual intimacy with him. PW 12 was also too
keen to marry him as she said so specifically. But
we find no evidence which gives rise to an
inference beyond reasonable doubt that the
accused had no intention to marry her at all from
the inception and that the promise he made was
false to his knowledge. No circumstances emerging
from the prosecution evidence establish this fact.
On the other hand, the statement of PW 12 that
"later on", the accused became ready to marry her
but his father and others took him away from the
village would indicate that the accused might have
been prompted by a genuine intention to marry
which did not materialise on account of the
pressure exerted by his family elders. It seems to
be a case of breach of promise to marry rather
than a case of false promise to marry. On this
aspect also, the observations of this Court in Uday
case [Uday v. State of Karnataka, (2003) 4 SCC
46: 2003 SCC (Cri) 775] at para 24 come to the
aid of the appellant."
Mary Angel & Ors vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 May, 1999
(emphasis added)
This extract is taken from Mary Angel v. State of
T.N., (1999) 5 SCC 209 : 1999 SCC (Cri) 1296 : 1999
SCC OnLine SC 583 at page 222