Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (4.31 seconds)
Sh. Salam Singh vs Union Of India Through on 9 December, 2013 cites

Sub. Maj. R.S.Rana And Ors. vs Union Of India And Ors. on 23 September, 2008

While considering a similar matter, Honble High Court of Delhi in Writ Petition (C) No. 109/2010 (Dr. R.S. Rana & Ors. Vs. UOI & Ors.) on 20.05.2013 held that anomaly has arisen on account of the fact that the post of DEO D is getting the same pay scale as that of STA despite the fact that DEO is a higher post. Consequently, they remanded the matter back to the Tribunal to adjudicate this issue of anomaly.
Delhi High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 5 - S K Kaul - Full Document

Hari Kishan vs State Of Punjab And Another on 21 November, 2011

6A Division Bench of this Court in Har Kishan & Anr. v State of Punjab & Anr 1987(5)SLR, 539 held that where a lower post is equated with regard to pay scale with the promotional post, it was a clear anomaly and was highly irrational. Another Division Bench of this Court in P.L. Goyal v State of Haryana & Ors., 1990(5) SLR 108, held that reducing the pay scale on promotion would be violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 3 - R Bahri - Full Document

Jag Pal Goyal And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 5 April, 2011

6A Division Bench of this Court in Har Kishan & Anr. v State of Punjab & Anr 1987(5)SLR, 539 held that where a lower post is equated with regard to pay scale with the promotional post, it was a clear anomaly and was highly irrational. Another Division Bench of this Court in P.L. Goyal v State of Haryana & Ors., 1990(5) SLR 108, held that reducing the pay scale on promotion would be violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 5 - M S Sullar - Full Document
1