Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (1.58 seconds)Section 164 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 227 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 201 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Hem Chand vs State Of Jharkhand on 13 March, 2008
ii) The second contention of the learned counsel for the
petitioner is that although the incident is alleged to
have been taken place on 4th February, 2008 but the
FIR was registered only after a delay of five days on 9th
February, 2008 despite the fact that the mother of
Tapas Smt. Bhullu Dutta had expressed her doubt of
involvement of one Panditji and his family members in
the death of Tapas Dutta. Therefore, it was urged that
this factor, if taken into consideration, cumulatively
and clearly entitled the petitioner to discharge. The
learned counsel for the petitioner also referred to a
Crl.Rev.P. No.407/2009 Page 2 of 7
case titled as Hem Chand Vs. State of Jharkhand,
2008 (2) SCC (Cri) 537 wherein in para 13 it has been
held that :-
Section 365 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of U.P. vs Devi Son Of Mohan Singh, Nitua Son Of ... on 8 July, 2005
8. It may be pertinent to state here that in para 14 of the
same judgment the Apex Court has referred to another judgment
of the Supreme Court that is State of MP Vs. Mohan Lal (2006)
6 SCC 338 wherein it has been observed as under:-
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
1