Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.21 seconds)
M/S Haque Construction Company vs Union Of India on 30 July, 2025 cites

Trf Ltd vs Energo Engineering Projects Ltd on 3 July, 2017

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/08/2025 at 22:28:04 (Amendment) Act, 2015 (3 of 2016) and recognised by the decision of this Court in TRF Ltd. [TRF Ltd. v. Energo Engg. Projects Ltd., (2017) 8 SCC 377 : (2017) 4 SCC (Civ) 72]"
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 49 - Cited by 374 - D Misra - Full Document

Bharat Broadband Network Limited vs United Telecoms Limited on 16 April, 2019

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/08/2025 at 22:28:04 Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 ["the Amendment Act, 2015"], makes it clear that when a person is approached in connection with his possible appointment as an arbitrator, it is his duty to disclose in writing any circumstances which are likely to give rise to justifiable doubts as to his independence or impartiality. The disclosure is to be made in the form specified in the Sixth Schedule, and the grounds stated in the Fifth Schedule are to serve as a guide in determining whether circumstances exist which give rise to justifiable doubts as to the independence or impartiality of an arbitrator. Once this is done, the appointment of the arbitrator may be challenged on the ground that justifiable doubts have arisen under sub-section (3) of Section 12 subject to the caveat entered by sub-section (4) of Section 12. The challenge procedure is then set out in Section 13, together with the time-limit laid down in Section 13(2). What is important to note is that the Arbitral Tribunal must first decide on the said challenge, and if it is not successful, the Tribunal shall continue the proceedings and make an award. It is only post award that the party challenging the appointment of an arbitrator may make an application for setting aside such an award in accordance with Section 34 of the Act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 30 - Cited by 440 - R F Nariman - Full Document
1   2 Next