Raja Ram Maize Products vs Industrial Court Of M.P. & Ors on 21 March, 2001
(12). Learned counsel for the respondents would still urge
that the petitioner's challenge to the impugned action
is hopelessly time-barred at this stage and suffers
from delay and laches. It is argued that the
petitioner has "no continuous or recurring cause of
action" since the recovery was effected from him at
once in the year 2002. Reliance is placed upon a
decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Raja Ram
Maize Products vs Industrial Court of MP, (2001)
4 SCC 492.